Showing posts with label Ellen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ellen. Show all posts

Saturday, May 1, 2010

TAYLOR SWIFT BECOMES NEWEST SPOKESMODEL FOR COVER GIRL



Country music phenom Taylor Swift’s new CoverGirl deal puts well down the road to becoming not just a musical artist, but major brand. Get ready for the next music, fashion and film juggernaut.

Although just 20, Swift has already won the highest country music honor; has a movie to her credit opposite Twilight hottie Taylor Lautner.

Now she joins A-List celebs Rihanna, Drew Barrymore and Ellen DeGeneres, who also fronted for CoverGirl.

The deal also puts Swift in the same league as Miley Cyrus, although not quite the same level.

The Hannah Montana star is still far and away the leading teen brand-maker, with music, movies, television and fashion deals.

Swift will rep for the “easy, breezy, beautiful” line’s new luxury collection, a rep for CoverGirl confirmed. No names have been announced for the new line.

“I am so excited to become the next CoverGirl,” Taylor said in a statement.

“I have admired many of the CoverGirls since I was a little girl… great artists and actresses who are confident and still themselves.

“It’s like a dream come true to be a part of the future of CoverGirl,” Swift said.

Ads are expected to roll out in January 2011 along with the new line.

Taylor, meanwhile, is still touring. Her “Fearless” tour is currently cris-crossing the country.

Swift told Teen Vogue last year that she’s the kind of person who believes everything happens for a reason.

This time money may be the biggest. But the deal also cements Swift as a star who transcends country music.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

LANE BRYANT: AN AMERICAN IDOL




Lane Bryant's controversial new lingerie ad has been given an airdate on Fox, April 28, during the closing minutes of the 9 p.m. edition of American Idol.

The women's clothing manufacturer had claimed both Fox and ABC objected to the commercial's content.

Though the commercial will now air on Idol, both client and media still seem peeved. LB has accused the networks of bias against large-size women—and the networks have denied such claims, accusing LB of trying to milk a non-story for publicity purposes.

LB took its battle to the blogosphere Tuesday with a rather testy entry on its Inside Curve venue, lambasting Fox and ABC for resisting efforts to place the ad in shows including Dancing With the Stars and Idol.

LB complained that it was being treated differently from Victoria's Secret, which has aired spots on both networks. The marketer essentially accused the networks of having a bias against larger women, with presumably more to show when wearing lingerie compared to the "waif-like" models in the VS ads, which LB said "run regularly" on both nets. "There's no difference other than they're bigger girls," the LB representative said.

The blog entry and ad were posted Tuesday and taken down Wednesday due to what an LB rep said was a "legal trademark issue." Both are now available online. "It had nothing to do with the content" of either the blog item or the ad, the rep said of their temporary removal.

The rep said the company was still steamed at the networks, given that the marketer hoped to break the spot in this week's shows. "[We're] disappointed that Fox rejected the ad three times before they finally agreed to air it next week," the LB rep said.

Lane Bryant's controversial new lingerie ad has been given an airdate on Fox, April 28, during the closing minutes of the 9 p.m. edition of American Idol.

The women's clothing manufacturer had claimed both Fox and ABC objected to the commercial's content.

Though the commercial will now air on Idol, both client and media still seem peeved. LB has accused the networks of bias against large-size women—and the networks have denied such claims, accusing LB of trying to milk a non-story for publicity purposes.

LB took its battle to the blogosphere Tuesday with a rather testy entry on its Inside Curve venue, lambasting Fox and ABC for resisting efforts to place the ad in shows including Dancing With the Stars and Idol.

LB complained that it was being treated differently from Victoria's Secret, which has aired spots on both networks. The marketer essentially accused the networks of having a bias against larger women, with presumably more to show when wearing lingerie compared to the "waif-like" models in the VS ads, which LB said "run regularly" on both nets. "There's no difference other than they're bigger girls," the LB representative said.

The blog entry and ad were posted Tuesday and taken down Wednesday due to what an LB rep said was a "legal trademark issue." Both are now available online. "It had nothing to do with the content" of either the blog item or the ad, the rep said of their temporary removal.

The rep said the company was still steamed at the networks, given that the marketer hoped to break the spot in this week's shows. "[We're] disappointed that Fox rejected the ad three times before they finally agreed to air it next week," the LB rep said.

Fox sources countered, however, that it frequently asks marketers to re-edit spots just as it did with Bryant as well as with Victoria's Secret ads that have aired. The sources said LB's refusal to comply with requested changes caused the delay that prevented it from airing this week. "Following Lane Bryant's refusal to make requested edits, Fox agreed to air the unedited ad during the last 10 minutes" of next Wednesday's Idol program at 9 p.m., a source said.

The Fox sources said the VS ad that aired this week on Idol complied with requested edits "and was specifically produced to meet Fox's standards for American Idol."

Fox sources also pointed to the fact that they have aired Playtex underwear ads for "full-figured women" on American Idol to counter LB's accusation that the network has a bias against plus-sized females. The sources also stressed that the VS ads air only on the 9 p.m. Idol programs, not at 8 p.m.

In a statement, ABC said of LB: "Their statements are not true. The ad was accepted. Lane Bryant was treated absolutely no differently than any advertiser for the same product. We were willing to accommodate them, but they chose to seek publicity instead."

There is no immediate word on when the ad will air on ABC.